Member: Jetfire1












Member: 62oldsf85












Member: JetfireGuy











XTR Prototype
(courtesy of General Motors)












Member: JimNoel











Member: JimNoel
Custom 1962 Jetfire Wagon

Home Blog Blog 62 Cutlass Spindle conversion

62 Cutlass Spindle conversion

Home Page Forums Discussion Topics – Ask the Experts 62 Cutlass Spindle conversion

This topic contains 38 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by  joe_padavano 4 months, 2 weeks ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #13716

    captiannapalm
    Participant

    Any thoughts of an offset m\c?

    #13717

    oaklyss
    Participant

    These cars only weigh 2700 lbs, There is really not reason to go 5 lug. Plenty of nice wheels. If you rebuild the brakes properly, the stock drums are more then sufficient. I never had a need for disc brakes. These are rare cars and imho should be left stock

    #13727

    joe_padavano
    Participant
    Any thoughts of an offset m\c?

    Why do you need an “offset” M/C? I thought we covered the M/C options back in August.

    #13728

    captiannapalm
    Participant

    so i dont mess with cutting the shock brace

    #13731

    joe_padavano
    Participant
    so i dont mess with cutting the shock brace

    Why can’t you use the Fairmont M/C as discussed previously in this thread? Ports are on the side away from the brace. No cutting required.

    #13732

    62cutlassconvert
    Participant

    I now have driving time on my Fairmont M/C with manual brakes and disc conversion up front, same M/C as Joe’s, and although it’s a long pedal I find it very acceptable with easy modulation and good stopping. No brace cutting needed, slight movement/grinding of the current relief for the M/C in the unibody frame flange, NBD.

    #13742

    captiannapalm
    Participant

    You also mentioned long pedal.

    #13754

    62cutlassconvert
    Participant

    Yes, long pedal, works good.
    If you want get a Baer Racing “Remaster” MC. It’s short, ports on both sides, comes 15/16, 1″ , and 1 1/16″, billet alum, in colors, no brainer fit, larger bore will shorten pedal, and it’s about $400.

    #13758

    joe_padavano
    Participant

    Keep in mind that a larger bore increased pedal force requirements for a given braking force.

Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

New Posts in the Forum

Recently Active

Profile picture of bartmo
Profile picture of oaklyss
Profile picture of jensenracing77
Profile picture of johnsage
Profile picture of BruceM
Profile picture of captiannapalm
Profile picture of deucephaeton
Profile picture of tbirdz12
Profile picture of 62cutlassconvert
Profile picture of twobolts
Profile picture of doctorg
Profile picture of Booster
Profile picture of jeremy
Profile picture of willcut
Profile picture of joe_padavano

Who’s Online

There are no users currently online