Member: Jetfire1

Member: 62oldsf85

Member: JetfireGuy

XTR Prototype
(courtesy of General Motors)

Member: JimNoel

Member: JimNoel
Custom 1962 Jetfire Wagon

Home Blog Blog 63 Automatic Cutlass 10.75 Compression?

63 Automatic Cutlass 10.75 Compression?

Home Page Forums Discussion Topics – Ask the Experts 63 Automatic Cutlass 10.75 Compression?

This topic contains 4 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  jensenracing77 4 months, 4 weeks ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
  • #13987


    I was just informed and checked it with original documents but the 63 Cutlass engine with the automatic transmission got 10.75:1 compression? This is in more than one factory document. I had no idea of this and wondering how they got the higher compression? Or if this is a really big screw up in the publications department. I would assume that it is true because I have a 63 inspectors guide that has a specific code for the 10.75 compression engine. Then when I look at the 63 service manual it does not show a special piston for a 10.75 engine. I am confused by this and wondering how they got the higher compression if they did not use a special piston in the traditional Oldsmobile fashion.



    Heads up,
    The compression in a 215 CID engine was changed with the size of the head cavity. The “volume” of a head is measured in cubic centimeters of liquid, usually water.The 10:75/1 automatic trans 1963 4 bbl engine has a 38cc head volume. The 4 bbl standard transmission and all Jetfire heads are 43cc or 10:25/1. The 2 bbl engines were all 51cc or 8.75/1. The exception is the export-low compression models. They were 8.25/1 for the 2 bbl and 8.5/1 for the 4bbl engines. Attached is the 1963 head numbers from my parts book and a chart for Piston/Rod/Compression ratio swaps for a 215 CID engine.

    [blockquote]BBCode you used is not allowed.[/blockquote]



    I had no idea that they had different heads. I thought it was only a dish piston for the 2 bbl and flat top with valve reliefs for everything else. I bet those 38cc heads are hard to find.



    Heads up,
    Maybe, with the correct casting numbers and no, easy to shave the other 2 heads down to 38cc’s. The 10.75/1, ’63 heads, shouldn’t be too hard to find, they made over 100,000 of them!



    I know you can mill them to that but I would not think the factory done it that way. Not sure how much would need milled but it could require shorter push rods.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

New Posts in the Forum

Recently Active

Profile picture of jensenracing77
Profile picture of oaklyss
Profile picture of deucephaeton
Profile picture of bartmo
Profile picture of 62cutlassconvert
Profile picture of clintbowers
Profile picture of mirrormatic
Profile picture of joe_padavano
Profile picture of eriftej
Profile picture of tbirdz12
Profile picture of mackemp
Profile picture of lockerdan
Profile picture of johnsage
Profile picture of kid442
Profile picture of classiccutlass

Who’s Online

There are no users currently online