Member: Jetfire1












Member: 62oldsf85












Member: JetfireGuy











XTR Prototype
(courtesy of General Motors)












Member: JimNoel











Member: JimNoel
Custom 1962 Jetfire Wagon

Home Blog Blog Question on ride problems

Question on ride problems

Home Page Forums Discussion Topics – Ask the Experts Question on ride problems

This topic contains 5 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  62oldsf85 2 months, 1 week ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #13808

    62cutlassconvert
    Participant

    Have my 62 convertible on the road now. New bushings/springs/shocks at the rear, new ball joints/fully cleaned and lubed tight bushings/new springs/shocks/sway bar bushings/good tie rod ends and drag link at front. Original steering box but it steers well without much of any play

    I live in a rural area with bumpy roads and when hitting sharp bumps going slow or fast get a considerable rubbery jiggle in the car and steering.

    Has no issue on smooth road, handles well.

    Is this normal in the convertible?
    If not, any real knowledge/experience of what the problem could be.
    The obvious thought I have is the front subframe mounts but they seem to be in good original condition, Bolts are tight.

    Thanks

    #13809

    joe_padavano
    Participant

    It’s called “cowl shake” and is common in convertibles, especially unibody ones. The 61-63 converts don’t have nearly as much additional stiffening as do new convertibles.

    #13810

    62cutlassconvert
    Participant

    I was afraid of that.

    So pretty normal for these cars I guess?

    I have had convertibles in the past, including american cars, and have a ’62 Jag convertible now and none have the amount of Cowl Shake, which involves considerable steering wheel shake in this car, as is present here. And it is a really tight car in good condition. Too bad, disappointing.

    So nothing else to check?
    Thanks Joe

    #13816

    joe_padavano
    Participant

    Keep in mind that the Jag has a real frame. The Y-body cars (along with the Corvair) were GM’s first production unibody cars. They had a lot of learning to do. With the roof cut off, there isn’t a lot of structure between the firewall and the rear quarters – just the rocker panels and those two little “frame rails” that are spot welded to the bottom of the floor pan.

    #13817

    62cutlassconvert
    Participant

    Yeah, I know, gotta accept the “vilntageness” I guess, still a little disappointing there’s so much shake. Had some early 60s Alfa converts that were unibody with frame stiffners and they were good as I recall. The Etype is a hybrid, full unibody with very deep sills firewall back with the front end a tube frame bolted to the firewall so I see your point. Too bad GM didn’t learn when the lessons were out there but that’s how the US lost the market to Japan in the 70s too.

    #13838

    62oldsf85
    Participant

    Joe, as usual, is correct. Completely rebuilt front end on mine and you get that, it seems. At least I do.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

New Posts in the Forum

Recently Active

Profile picture of jensenracing77
Profile picture of jetfireparts
Profile picture of oaklyss
Profile picture of JimNoel
Profile picture of macf85
Profile picture of doctorg
Profile picture of 62cutlassconvert
Profile picture of kid442
Profile picture of bstang
Profile picture of joe_padavano
Profile picture of clintbowers
Profile picture of johnsage
Profile picture of twobolts
Profile picture of tbirdz12
Profile picture of bartmo

Who’s Online

Profile picture of jensenracing77