• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Register
Skip to content
OldsJetfire.com

OldsJetfire.com

  • Home
  • Car Pictures
    • 1962 Registered Cars Pictures
    • 1963 Registered Cars Pictures
    • Registered Cars Missing Owners
    • Turbo Cutaway Pictures
    • Concept Car Pictures
  • Forum
  • Classifieds
  • Car Registration
    • Register Your Car
    • 1962 Registered Cars List
    • 1963 Registered Cars List
  • Articles
    • Jewels from Jetfire Guy
    • Nuggets from Noel
    • Sweets from Sweeter
    • Stories from Members
    • Links to Related Websites
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Membership
    • Log In
    • Site Wide Activity
    • Members List
  • About Us
Close Button

Jetfire block vs f85/cutlass block

Home Page › Forums › Discussion Topics – Ask the Experts › Jetfire block vs f85/cutlass block

  • This topic has 16 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 3 months ago by scott.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 17 total)
1 2 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 30, 2017 at 12:13 pm #13324
    young olds
    Participant

    I’ve seen vague mention of the jetfire block being “beefier” than the standard block. Does anyone know this to be true? If so where does the “beef” come in? Mains, caps, both?

    November 30, 2017 at 1:50 pm #13325
    jensenracing77
    Participant

    I am sure others know better but I do not think the block was any different. I think it was just the pistons, rod caps and rod bolts. They had better bearings but all replacement bearings now are the same as the Jetfire bearings were.

    November 30, 2017 at 2:50 pm #13326
    young olds
    Participant

    if thats the case i wont seek out a jetfire block i know about for a future build. if anyone else knows any different please let me know

    November 30, 2017 at 3:13 pm #13327
    jensenracing77
    Participant

    They were stamped specific to the Jetfire on the front pad. It is nice to have the correct number stamped in the block but other than that I do not think there was a difference. I would also assume that the Jetfire specific stamp is to identify it as a short block assembly and not the specific Jetfire block. If there is a difference I hope to learn myself.

    The Jetfire stamps were also specific for 62 and then for 63.

    November 30, 2017 at 3:47 pm #13328
    joe_padavano
    Participant

    Here’s a bit of info. According to that April 62 parts book, Olds did not list a bare block, only a block assembly that included the fitted pistons, rings, and cam and main bearings. The 2bl, 4bbl, and Jetfire block assemblies all had different part numbers, primarily due to the different pistons. There is no indication of any differences in the bare block casting.

    Attachments:

    You must be logged in to access attached files.

    November 30, 2017 at 4:45 pm #13330
    jensenracing77
    Participant

    Are you looking for anything specific? I have a 63 Jetfire engine I am going to pull apart and sell off what is still good. The pistons are frozen in the cylinders but will not know how bad it is till I get it apart. If the block is ok I would sell it for $300. If you wanted to chance it I would sell it as is, intake to pan for $500, exhaust manifolds and turbo stuff not included. I know at least one spark plug hole will need fixed. It is a 4 speed engine but no flywheel.

    November 30, 2017 at 6:50 pm #13331
    62 Cutlass Convert
    Participant

    My understanding is that the Turbo engines have deeper bolt holes/longer bolts for the main bearing caps. I believe there are some other small differences but they escape me at the moment. I’ll check back if I can find the info.

    November 30, 2017 at 7:02 pm #13332
    Jim Noel
    Participant

    The Jetfire block is different than a 215 used in any other body style. The main bearing cap bolt holes were drilled and threaded 9/32″ deeper. The main bearing cap bolts are 9/32″ longer and have 12 point heads. The pistons used were only used in ’62 & ’63 Jetfire’s and ’63 4bbl carb cars. The main bearings were “Marine-400” bearings and were unique to the Jetfire cars. The heads and valves were different too, but you only asked about the block. You can make a Jetfire block from a non-Jetfire block by drilling the main cap bolt holes deeper and threading them to fit the longer Jetfire bolts. Functionally, it will work, but as Eric states, the block identification will be incorrect. Just depends on what outcome you want?

    November 30, 2017 at 9:07 pm #13333
    young olds
    Participant

    Just looking for a stronger block without going rover block

    November 30, 2017 at 11:36 pm #13334
    62 Cutlass Convert
    Participant

    Checked with the machinist and also uses beefier rods and longer head bolts.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 17 total)
1 2 →
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Search

Archives

  • May 2014
  • November 2013
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Categories

  • Articles
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Jewels from Jetfireguy
    • Noels Tech Articles
    • Nuggets from Noel
    • Stories from Members
    • Sweets from Sweeter
  • Concept Cars Pictures
  • Newsflash
  • Registered Cars
  • Registered Cars Pictures
  • Turbo Cutaway Pictures
  • Uncategorized
  • Unlinked Articles

Automobile WordPress Theme By Themespride