• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Register
Skip to content
OldsJetfire.com

OldsJetfire.com

  • Home
  • Car Pictures
    • 1962 Registered Cars Pictures
    • 1963 Registered Cars Pictures
    • Registered Cars Missing Owners
    • Turbo Cutaway Pictures
    • Concept Car Pictures
  • Forum
  • Classifieds
  • Car Registration
    • Register Your Car
    • 1962 Registered Cars List
    • 1963 Registered Cars List
  • Articles
    • Jewels from Jetfire Guy
    • Nuggets from Noel
    • Sweets from Sweeter
    • Stories from Members
    • Links to Related Websites
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Membership
    • Log In
    • Site Wide Activity
    • Members List
  • About Us
Close Button

62 Cutlass Spindle conversion

Home Page › Forums › Discussion Topics – Ask the Experts › 62 Cutlass Spindle conversion

  • This topic has 38 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 9 months ago by joe_padavano.
Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)
← 1 2 3 4
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 20, 2018 at 7:25 pm #13716
    scott
    Participant

    Any thoughts of an offset m\c?

    May 20, 2018 at 8:34 pm #13717
    Greg Oakley
    Participant

    These cars only weigh 2700 lbs, There is really not reason to go 5 lug. Plenty of nice wheels. If you rebuild the brakes properly, the stock drums are more then sufficient. I never had a need for disc brakes. These are rare cars and imho should be left stock

    May 22, 2018 at 11:13 am #13727
    joe_padavano
    Participant

    [quote quote=13716]Any thoughts of an offset m\c?[/quote]

    Why do you need an “offset” M/C? I thought we covered the M/C options back in August.

    May 22, 2018 at 11:33 am #13728
    scott
    Participant

    so i dont mess with cutting the shock brace

    May 24, 2018 at 9:26 am #13731
    joe_padavano
    Participant

    [quote quote=13728]so i dont mess with cutting the shock brace[/quote]

    Why can’t you use the Fairmont M/C as discussed previously in this thread? Ports are on the side away from the brace. No cutting required.

    May 24, 2018 at 12:54 pm #13732
    62 Cutlass Convert
    Participant

    I now have driving time on my Fairmont M/C with manual brakes and disc conversion up front, same M/C as Joe’s, and although it’s a long pedal I find it very acceptable with easy modulation and good stopping. No brace cutting needed, slight movement/grinding of the current relief for the M/C in the unibody frame flange, NBD.

    June 2, 2018 at 6:22 pm #13742
    scott
    Participant

    You also mentioned long pedal.

    June 7, 2018 at 6:14 pm #13754
    62 Cutlass Convert
    Participant

    Yes, long pedal, works good.
    If you want get a Baer Racing “Remaster” MC. It’s short, ports on both sides, comes 15/16, 1″ , and 1 1/16″, billet alum, in colors, no brainer fit, larger bore will shorten pedal, and it’s about $400.

    June 8, 2018 at 9:35 am #13758
    joe_padavano
    Participant

    Keep in mind that a larger bore increased pedal force requirements for a given braking force.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)
← 1 2 3 4
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Search

Archives

  • May 2014
  • November 2013
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Categories

  • Articles
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Jewels from Jetfireguy
    • Noels Tech Articles
    • Nuggets from Noel
    • Stories from Members
    • Sweets from Sweeter
  • Concept Cars Pictures
  • Newsflash
  • Registered Cars
  • Registered Cars Pictures
  • Turbo Cutaway Pictures
  • Uncategorized
  • Unlinked Articles

Automobile WordPress Theme By Themespride